The issue of whether or not we as families should allow home visits is a regular topic for discussion within the home education UK community.
Home educating families hold a range of views regarding home visits from openly welcoming an opportunity to show off what they are doing through to being utterly opposed to home visits as an infringement of both their own and their child’s rights as private individuals.
The Legal Position In England and Wales:
The law is quite clear on the subject. While we must inform the school of our decision to withdraw a child from the register, there is no obligation for us to inform the LA or to allow them access to our homes. Case law says:
When the LA becomes aware that you are home educating they may informally ask about what provision you are making for your children’s education. While you are under no obligation in law to reply, should you remain silent, the LA may conclude that you are making no provision and therefore, parents would be wise to make some kind of response to these enquiries.
However, since the LA must look at any submission that a court would regard as reasonable and due to a legal principle known as ʺaudi alterem partemʺ literally meaning ʺhear the other sideʺ, the LA may not prescribe the form of submission it will accept by for example limiting it to, or insisting upon a home visit or indeed, anything else such as a pro forma submission.
If however, after considering a family’s submission, the LA still cannot conclude that a reasonable person would consider that ‘there is no reason to think that the family is not providing an education’, the LA may ask for more formal evidence of education. Though this also may not include a demand for a home visit.
A parent’s right not to have a home visit
A parent’s right not to have home visits is also protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR and The Human Rights Act) which protects our rights to a private family life. This right should normally prevent attempts by the LA to continue to insist upon access to our home after a parent has pointed out to them that this is unacceptable.
Section 175(1) of the Education Act 2002:
Some LAʹs in England and Wales quote Section 175(1) of the Education Act 2002.:
They sometimes add that should a family refuse a visit then the LA will report the family to the social services department on welfare grounds. However, for a referral to social services to be legitimate the LA are required to have grounds for believing that the child is at some form of significant risk. The fact that the child is home educated is not of itself evidence of risk. (Indeed several letters informing families of this policy have perversely stated that in their case they do not consider that there is a risk to the particular child, so on what grounds they make such a referral is open to speculation).
There is clearly a degree of confusion regarding this section of the act however it is clear that it does not confer any new powers upon the LA. It simply informs them of their responsibilities regarding existing duties and reminds them to carry them out, at all times, with ʺdue regardʺ to the children’s welfare. Therefore, if there is no evidence of any outstanding welfare issues, then they have no legitimate grounds for a referral.
Thus a referral by an LA to Social Services, exclusively on the grounds that a child is being home educated, and the family are (quite legally) refusing a home visit could be regarded as a malicious referral and a breach of Article 8 of the human rights act.
Why might you not want a visit?
Putting aside the privacy issues, families should be aware that when they welcome an LA representative into their home, the primary purpose of the visit is to collect evidence of a failure to suitably educate a child in accordance with section 7 of the Education Act 1996. should they decide that your provision is in some way unsuitable, this evidence may be presented to a court in support of a ʺSchool Attendance Orderʺ.
The LA would consider their perception of everything they see and hear as evidence and present it as such to the court. By allowing an officer into their home a parent surrenders control of the evidence. For example, if your house is tidy they could say that your ʺobsessively tidyʺ home exhibits a failure to allow sufficient opportunity for creative play. If it’s untidy they can say that your home is chaotic and you fail to provide a sufficiently structured environment. As its all down to interpretation, they can in fact say anything and once said it’s difficult to repair the damage.
Sadly it has become apparent to me from reading many accounts of home visits over 25 years years, that some LAs use visits to justify decisions already made. Reports are sometimes singularly biased and are clearly intended to bully parents into returning their children to school.
While most, visits and encounters with LA representatives work out well, it’s hard to judge the LA’s position beforehand. I, and other advisers, have therefore come to the conclusion that it is unsafe to allow an LA representative into your home. If they’re not allowed in your home they can’t come to any conclusions about it.
If you decide not to have a visit I have a template letter that you can edit and send to the local authority.
Why you might want a visit
Besides reasons of personal choice, some parents may choose to allow home visits for a variety of reasons such as separation and divorce. It is our experience that in a significant number of cases ex-partners, even were they previously supportive of their children being home educated, become hostile to it continuing once they leave the family home. The reason for this change of heart appears to be a concern that if the partner with whom the children now live continues to home educate, they are likely not to work and will therefore expect an improved divorce settlement.
It is understood that lawyers often advise the absent parent to object to home education so as to remove any obstacle to the resident parent from working. In these circumstances a good relationship with your LA, with some affirmative reports, could help to swing the court away from forcing the resident parent into registering the children in school. A home visit might be seen as a necessary compromise in achieving this.
SEN’s and Disabilities
Many home educated children have complex SEN’s and Disabilities which require complex technical assistance from the LA. Under these circumstances it seems to be common sense that home visits are allowed so as to enable all the agencies involved to correctly asses the children’s needs in the environment in which s/he lives.
Past issues and concerns with social services
Some home educating families have had concerns raised by social services. These may have been discharged as having been groundless or may have been fully dealt with. Nonetheless, the authorities are likely to have these issues on record. While, strictly speaking, there is no legal reason for the authorities to insist upon a home visit it might be considered prudent to allow them so as to reduce the probability of social services developing further interests in your family. Similar arguments might be put where residents of the home (either family members or their partners) have a criminal record or previous record of involvement with social services whether it had anything to do with children or not.
How then to present evidence?
I would suggest that at least one face to face meeting could take place on neutral ground, a library or cafe, even a McDonaldʹs. This meeting should help put a face to the names and establish a relationship between yourselves and the LA representative. Ideally you should take a friend, by preference an experienced home educator and possibly your partner (should you have one ‐ if s/he works its worth a day off) but not your children ‐ who should be left with supportive, trusted friends or family.
It is important that you remain calm and present a professional attitude at all times, even in the face of provocation, intimidation or downright lies concerning the law and home education. Take as much documentation as you are happy to offer, in particular if you haven’t already produced one, you should prepare an educational philosophy. According to article 2 of the first protocol of the ECHR authorities must respect the parent’s philosophy with respect to education and your educational philosophy outlines this. The home education UK web site has a number of example documents in its legal section to help you construct your own.
You should not forget a notebook in which you can record anything of importance that is said to you. Indeed, in extreme circumstances, parents have been known to record meetings on tape and even on video. You should at least write down any decisions made and action to be taken. If the officer makes any categorical statements you should also write these down as well as any promises you make (I would advise you not to make any promises especially ʺon the hoofʺ say rather that you will come back to them on this once you have had a chance to consider the idea).
After the meeting you should write a letter to the officer you met confirming anything important in your notes, particularly points of agreement, actions to be taken and issues outstanding. It is then up to the LA to deny that your account of the meeting is correct. All communication should be in writing. Any unavoidable phone calls should be logged (A record of time, names and details) and again confirmed in writing including any important verbal messages. This ensures that in the unlikely event that it comes to court action, an accurate written record is available.
If you still want to have a visit
If you still think a home visit is best for you, you may want to consider the following suggestions: